They're patronizing us. Technically we're all using the word "canceled" wrong. They didn't cancel it, they just opted to not renew it. So they're using semantics to try and look like they're the good guys.
Well, they're certainly not 'the bad guys'. While CN hardly put a lot of effort into trying to capitalize on the series they did certainly spend a lot of money on creating the series and airing in completion.
Looking back on Greg's comment about being swamped with work, let's hope he's referring to an Earth-16 spin-off. I mean, if he wasn't, then it was a bit cruel of him to phrase it like that at a time when lots of Young Justice fans were waiting with baited breath for word on season 3. It led a few people on, with good reason. So maybe it was some kind of veiled reassurance? A spin-off would be nice... though I think we should still push for a mini-series.
Cause Sam Register says so. And that last part is malarkey, children loved the show as much as teenagers and adults.Why would CN greenlit another expensive 2D animated project when Young Justice only did so-so in ratings and didn't catch on with young kids?
5 years? I'm surprised by your optimistic outlook. Or are you counting hiatus periods, too?The new CG Batman show will be their flagship series for at least the next 5 years, and TT Go is a comedy series just like CN's other comedy shows right now. They probably only want one, "action cartoon" and its Batman because they want to sell Batman toys.
No show ever made to 100 unless you lump BTAS, AOB&R, and TNBA together yet just about every show made after could last that long, too.They canceled Teen Titans at 65 episodes despite it being insanely popular at the time. I could have seen that show lasting for 100 episodes, but they ended it anyway since they had enough for syndication.
Again, because Sam Register said so.To be honest I'm surprised Young Justice even got made in the first place. The animation for the show had to be very expensive, and the large cast of heroes made it difficult for young children to follow since it didn't exactly focus on the same characters week after week. The fact that all the starting cast was unknown except Robin to kids probably didn't help either.
Everything's "expensive" - What numbers are you going off of and what is the source of these numbers?GREG: And it intimidated both of us. Sam sort of said, “Here’s the kind of show we want to do, something with Justice League, or the young characters or something like that,” and he threw out the Young Justice title, just the title, and I think we were both terrified, because Bruce’s [Bruce Timm] Justice League Unlimited is so iconic, and so great, and Teen Titans is a very different show, but it’s also a great show in the other direction, and so for us to forge something that was new, and wasn’t treading on the turf of those two shows was sort of scary. And then we sort of found our placement with this covert ops team, and I put together a list of – I’m not kidding – 50 teenage characters for us to choose from. We went through and made the decision fairly early on that this was going to be a young DC universe, that Superman will have only shown up ten years ago, put on the cape ten years ago, Batman would have only put on the cape nine years ago, that the heroes haven’t been around that long, and once you’ve made that decision, then the idea of starting with Dick Grayson and Wally West, the original side kicks, they’re still young…
BRANDON: I think that also helped us get out from under the shadow of these other shows, like Teen Titans and Justice League – to sort of reset the DC youth, in a way, and that allowed us the freedom to find our own identity.
GREG: I think, from an economic standpoint, we have to hit boys 6 – 14 for Cartoon Network to sell their ad space or whatever, so if you think of it as a bull’s eye with concentric circles, that’s the bull’s eye we have to hit – but I’m not satisfied with that and I don’t think Brandon is either. A, we want boys and girls, so there’s a lot of great relationship stuff in this, there’s humor in this show – I mean, it’s a serious show, but there’s a lot of humor in it, there’s a lot of eye candy for little kids. I think little kids could enjoy this show, and some stuff will go over their heads, but they won’t know it’s going over their heads. There are a lot of explosions and guys in costumes, big villains and big events that are eye candy for the youngest audience, but there’s a lot of sophisticated stories for a teen audience, a college age audience, an old fart audience like me – and I certainly think any fan of DC comics in general is going to find a lot of great stuff from the 75 year history of DC comics to enjoy in the show.
Cause Sam Register says so. And that last part is malarkey, children loved the show as much as teenagers and adults.
5 years? I'm surprised by your optimistic outlook. Or are you counting hiatus periods, too?
Everything's "expensive" - What numbers are you going off of and what is the source of these numbers?
TT isn't innocent of deviating from its main cast either in the later seasons. I didn't like Teen Titans. I actually ignored watching the show until 2009 when I pounced on some deal and got all the DVDs. I think JLU had the same insane following at the time. After those two ended, we never saw a show that caught a big a fire as they did. We don't exactly have a Kids WB to air reruns of YJ and GL, at least CN bothered to air some on Boomerang during the last hiatus. There's that Vortexx block but it's no Kids WB...Was it really? The show never seemed to catch on the same way Teen Titans did. The toy line being canceled early didn't help. The stories were too serious and the main cast was too large for kids to get attached, its not like how Teen Titans focused on the same 5 characters and was very comedic. Plus everyone who was around back then surely remembers how insanely popular Teen Titans was. Even KidsWB starting airing it on Saturday mornings for some time despite being reruns.
But that was Kids WB, not CN. Two different beasts. I just don't believe anymore that a show can last 5 years. 2-3 seems to be the rule of thumb now but it gets muddled now because CN starts off with these big 26 episode orders whereas TT and The Batman were 13 episode pick ups.The Batman lasted 5 years. Either way it'll probably get a full 65 episode run regardless since CN speeds through airings sometimes.
I seem to remember Sam Liu or someone on GL or BTB saying it the CG shows were more expensive than 2D. Might have been one of the SDCC's.CG animation is cheaper than the expensive hand-drawn 2D animation Young Justice uses. This is why Green Lantern and Batman are using it because they only have to create the character models once and then continualy re-use them.
No show ever made to 100 unless you lump BTAS, AOB&R, and TNBA together yet just about every show made after could last that long, too.
But that was Kids WB, not CN. Two different beasts. I just don't believe anymore that a show can last 5 years. 2-3 seems to be the rule of thumb now but it gets muddled now because CN starts off with these big 26 episode orders whereas TT and The Batman were 13 episode pick ups.
Correct, I was just talking about DC Comics shows. Clone Wars just achieved that milestone this year, right? Not to digress but I think I saw that one and was wondering why it was just robots and that little dude starring.I know it's not a DC Comics show but Star Wars: The Clone Wars has lasted 5 seasons with over 100 episodes on Cartoon Network.
Poor timing I guess. They mostly do multiple episode story arcs like the '90s Spider-Man TAS instead of single episodes now and episode 100 just happened to be the second to last episode of that poorly received arc. I guess that's better than having a clip show interrupt it and pushing back the Darth Maul episodes even further.Correct, I was just talking about DC Comics shows. Clone Wars just achieved that milestone this year, right? Not to digress but I think I saw that one and was wondering why it was just robots and that little dude starring.
I just saw this message on Cartoon Network's Facebook page.
Hopefully, this means they've been paying attention to Twitter.![]()
I'd like to say a few words in defense of Cartoon Network. It is true that many of their decisions regarding Young Justice were questionable.
I also understand that CN's corporate "happy-talk" can be frustrating.
But, I have to believe that there are at least a few people at CN who didn't get into broadcasting just to make a lot of money but also to do quality work. Young Justice was a great show and I am sure that there at least some people at CN who were proud to be a part of that show's inception and they are probably more disappointed than anyone except perhaps Greg and Brandon that the show was not perceived as profitable enough to keep on the air. I'm still mad but I can have some empathy for people on the other side of the fence.
I seem to remember Sam Liu or someone on GL or BTB saying it the CG shows were more expensive than 2D. Might have been one of the SDCC's.
CG animation is cheaper than the expensive hand-drawn 2D animation Young Justice uses. This is why Green Lantern and Batman are using it because they only have to create the character models once and then continualy re-use them.
I seem to remember Sam Liu or someone on GL or BTB saying it the CG shows were more expensive than 2D. Might have been one of the SDCC's.